이삽코리아/한국우리사주협회
   

회원등록 비번분실
관련 뉴스
 커뮤니티
 ESOP Blog
  Treasury Proposes New ESOP Regulations A
ㆍ작성자: 안병룡 ㆍ작성일: 2009-04-18 (토) 12:18 ㆍ조회: 1126
ㆍ분류: 일반 ㆍ추천: 0  

In January 2008, the IRS published proposed regulations ("Proposed Regulations") under the new ESOP diversification rules of Section 401(a)(35) of the Internal Revenue Code ("Code").  The Proposed Regulations could impact several ESOP provisions of the Code, including: the independent appraiser requirement of Section 401(a)(28)(C), the put option rules of Section 409(h)(1)(B), the definition of employer securities under Section 409(l)(1), and the eligibility for a tax deferred sale to an ESOP under Section 1042, all of which apply to employer stock that is not publicly-traded.
Since the applicability of these four Code provisions turns on whether the ESOP plan sponsor has publicly-traded stock,  the Proposed Regulations suggest a test for determining when stock is publicly-traded for ESOP purposes.  The IRS has invited public comments on this matter.
Existing IRS Position on the Meaning of  "Publicly-Traded"
Since 1977, the Treasury Regulation Section 54.4975-7(b)(1)(iv)  (the "Prohibited Transaction Regulations") has provided that an employer security is treated as publicly traded for ESOP purposes if it is listed on a national securities exchange registered under section 6 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the '34 Act") or  is quoted on a system sponsored by a national securities association registered under Section 15A(b) of the Securities Exchange Act.  For many years, this definition effectively meant that a stock needed to be either quoted on one of the U.S. stock exchanges or quoted on the NASDAQ National Market System to be publicly traded.
When the Code was amended after 1977 to add new ESOP benefits (and requirements), Congress used the term "readily traded on an established securities market" rather than "publicly-traded."  However, the IRS in several private letter rulings ("PLRs") confirmed that the term "readily traded on an established securities market" would be defined by reference to the term "publicly traded" in the Prohibited Transaction Regulations until further guidance was published.
Clearly, all stocks traded on the New York and regional stock exchanges (that are registered) and stocks traded on NASDAQ would be publicly-traded for this purpose.
In 1990, NASD created the Over The Counter Bulletin Board ("OTCBB").  The OTCBB was essentially an automated version of the 'pink sheet' quotation system.  A question arose as to whether the OTCBB, having been created by NASD, could be said to be a system "sponsored by a national securities association."  In PLR 200052014, a taxpayer seeking to complete a Section 1042 transaction using stock quoted on the OTCBB requested a ruling on the matter.  In the PLR, the IRS found that the Section Prohibited Transaction Regulations were written based on an assumption that the  qualifying quotation systems would have "comprehensive standards" and broad powers which would be protective of the interests of participants and provide for enhanced marketability of quoted securities.  In the PLR, the IRS ruled that the OTCBB did not offer these benefits and protections and held accordingly that a stock quoted only on the OTCBB is not publicly-traded for ESOP purposes.
Stocks quoted only on foreign stock exchanges would not qualify as publicly-traded, since those exchanges are not registered under Section 6 of the '34 Act.
Proposed Regulations Definition
Under the Proposed Regulations, the IRS has continued its position that stock quoted on a Section 6 stock exchange is publicly-traded.  The Proposed Regulations note that NASDAQ is now itself an exchange and falls under that definition.   In addition, the IRS appears to have confirmed its position in PLR 200052014 that a stock quoted on the  OTCBB is not public-traded.  However, the IRS has taken the position, at least for the diversification rule of Section 401(a)(35), that a stock quoted on a foreign stock exchange that is regulated by its local government will be treated as publicly-traded, even though the foreign exchange is clearly not registered under the '34 Act.
The IRS has invited public comments on the question of whether the final definition under Section 401(a)(35) should be applied to the four other ESOP requirements that use the term "publicly-traded."  Some thoughts on the extension of the regulation follow:
Practical Considerations
Desire for Certainty in Legal Compliance.  First and foremost, ESOP sponsors need to know whether they are subject to the requirements to arrange for an independent appraisal of the stock in the ESOP each year and whether ESOP participants must be given a "put option" in connection with ESOP benefit distributions of stock.  For these reasons, it seems best to draw a bright line between what stock is and what stock is not publicly-traded.  Moreover, a shareholder who intends to make a Section 1042 election in connection with a sale of stock to an ESOP needs to know with certainty that he or she is eligible to make the election.
The Two Value Problem. The "bright-line" approach could create some difficulty for an OTCBB company with a relatively liquid market by requiring it to obtain an annual stock valuation.  The Company and the ESOP may believe that the quoted price for the stock properly reflects the stock's fair market value.  Nevertheless, the Company's ESOP would need to obtain an annual valuation.  Further, the exercise of a "put option" by a participant at a time when the market price is substantially lower than the prior year-end ESOP valuation could create difficulties for the ESOP and plan sponsor.
Coordination with the Adequate Consideration Definition. Section 3(18) of ERISA  provides a definition of the term "adequate consideration" for purposes of determining whether a purchase or sale of stock by an ESOP is exempt from the prohibited transaction rules by reason of Section 408 of ERISA.  Under Section 3(18) of ERISA, stock for which there is a "generally recognized market" can be bought and sold by an ESOP based on either: (1) the price prevailing on the Section 6 registered exchange on which it trades, or (2) if the stock is not quoted on a registered exchange, then at the bid/ask price established by "persons independent of the issuer."  If there is no "generally recognized market" for the stock, then the Department of Labor proposed regulations require an independent appraisal to establish value.  It is possible that an OTCBB quoted stock could have a "generally recognized market" if it is traded frequently, but would not meet the publicly-traded definition in the regulations proposed under Section 401(a)(35) of the Code.  It would be helpful if the Department of Labor could coordinate its position under Section 3(18) of ERISA with any final regulations published by IRS.
We expect to work with the Legislative & Regulatory Committee of The ESOP Association to develop appropriate comments for the IRS on the Proposed Regulations.
윗글 Timing Problems and Solutions for ESOP D
아래글 ESOPs Impacted by Landmark U.S. Supreme
번호     글 제 목  작성자 작성일 조회
ESOP 블로그 사용방법 관리자 2008-10-28 779
15 2010년 미국 1042조 개정안 발의 안병룡 2010-05-19 823
14 The Employee Ownership Update 2010년 4월 안병룡 2010-04-27 679
13 Six Elements of a Strong Employee Owners 안병룡 2009-09-16 878
12 ESOP Legislative Updates 안병룡 2009-09-16 823
11 Best Practices When Communicating Benefi 안병룡 2009-09-16 703
10 Using An Employee Committee to Informall 안병룡 2009-09-16 814
9 미국에서 은퇴자금 투자하기 안병룡 2009-06-10 949
8 부도시 노동조합 대응방향 안병룡 2009-05-08 893
7 한국언론에서 사원주주제의 어려움 안병룡 2009-05-08 877
6 1등이 망하는 시대, 사원주주제로 극복 안병룡 2009-05-08 918
5 Pitfalls In Selling Stock To Fund ESOP Repurchase Obligation.. 안병룡 2009-04-18 794
4 Pitfalls In Selling Stock To Fund ESOP Repurchase Obligation.. 안병룡 2009-04-18 842
3 Timing Problems and Solutions for ESOP D 안병룡 2009-04-18 905
2 Treasury Proposes New ESOP Regulations A 안병룡 2009-04-18 1126
1 ESOPs Impacted by Landmark U.S. Supreme 안병룡 2009-04-18 971
1

한국우리사주협회는 우리사주조합을 지원하기 위해 주식회사 이삽코리아가 운영하는 공익목적 웹사이트입니다.
한국우리사주협회 All right reserved 2003.   사업자등록번호 : 107-87-15203
서울 종로구 수송동 75. 두산위브파빌리온 735호.   대표자 : 안병룡  대표전화 : 010-2513-0888